COMBAT HELMETS HC Deb 21 January 1986 vol 90
HELMET, PARACHUTISTS, LIGHT WEIGHT |
|
There has been some confusion as to the proper designation of this UK paratroop helmet; it is variously known as simply the 'British Para' or - certainly incorrectly - as the M76 (after 1976, a supposed year of general introduction). The earliest models, made by Thetford Moulded Products, have a label that reads "HELMET, PARACHUTISTS, Light Weight", but after production was taken over my NPAerospace by the late 1980s this became more simply 'HELMET, PARACHUTE' |
|
There appear to be three variants - the earliest version has a smooth surface to the shell, and usually has bare-metal liner bolts. This shell is simply fibre-glass and offers no ballistic protection. |
The shape of the shell remains the same with later production runs, but the surface is textured. Also the liner bolts have been given a plastic coating. These rough-textured shells are made of a ballistically-resistant material. |
An early example in full regalia - the camo and net are taped on. Investigation has shown, however, that the shell is smooth, so therefore an early production example. |
Early production shell, with bare-metal bolts. |
The basic liner appears to remain the same in all cases - a cloth surround, four plastic lobes with an adjustable cord. The shell is actually made up in two parts - the outer 'ballistic plastic' (nylon fibre as in the Mk6 ?) and an inner lining, which appears to be nothing more than expanded polystyrene. |
The white 'polystyrene' inner shell is just about visible here. |
The inner shell has been removed from this example - replaced by two first-field-dressings (really) - but this photograph does not clearly show the inside of the BP shell because of reflection. |
Liner-bolt, plastic coated. |
The most significant differences are in the chinstraps - this is the earliest Thetford-produced model. |
A similar - if not identical - chinstrap system is used on another helmet by Thetford Moulded Products - see 'Northern Ireland' helmet below. |
This is the second version - a simple three-point harness with the chinstrap fastening through two tension-loops at about ear-level |
This would appear to be an awkward fastening method. |
Some users have improved the awkward chinstrap fastening by simply replacing the entire chinstrap with that from the GS Mk6 helmet, as shown here. Richard Jones comments - "...done for 1 of 2 reasons - 1 by Paras as it was a much better chinstrap/easier to open, close and adjust than the issue strap; 2 by non-Para squaddies who have acquired Para helmets due to various reasons and have fitted the MK6 chinstrap in order to try to hide the fact from angry RSMs that they are wearing a Para and not their issue M6 Helmet!" |
|
|
Photographs supplied by |
THETFORD HELMET, PARACHUTISTS, Light Weight "An early model shell/liner, which has had its originalvinyl straps replaced with the later version, as was the case with many of these. It is still identifiable as an early product by the white browpad (Yes, it really is white) and smooth shiny shell. The interior of the shell itself is entirely unremarkable - no embossing, no stamps, no label, no nothing. There is a curious rectangle of surfacing missing at the crown, though whether that has any significance is unknown. The liner is just an expanded polystyrene shell with a couple of cork infills which can be broken out for using earphones. It is just amazingly cheap and nasty in every sense. What was a surprise was finding the Thetford label on the liner itself." |
|
Photographs supplied by |
Mk6 - the General Service helmet from the early 1980s until the early 21st century. |
|
|
Photographs supplied by For more photographs, see Joseba's webpage here. |
Mk6 - some details of the liner The liner of this helmet is not often seen by collectors, as the only way of removing it is essentially destructive. The main fixing of the liner is by two rubber rivets thrust through the liner and shell from the inside. The rubber rivets are one-way only, and when the liner/shell sandwich has been made the only way of withdrawing the rivet is to completely cut off flush the two small 'horns' that are seen at the top rear of the helmet. The bad part of this is that once cut the rubber rivets at the rear cannot be replaced. As you will see below the rivets when unused are coinsiderably longer than necessary, as they have to be drawn (with some substantial effort) through the liner/shell sandwich. The excess is then cut off. |
|
Liner, side view; it is mostly polystyrene with some fabric padding |
Rear view, the holes for the rubber rivets can be seen above the green fabric band. |
Another rear view. |
Top rear of helmet shell showing holes from which the rivets have been withdrawn. |
The rubber rivets; the British Army spares number is CN8415 99 130 6035 Rivet Mk6. They have to be pushed into the liner/shell sandwich and then tightened by simply pulling with a pair of pliers; I say 'simply' but it does sound quite difficult. Then the protruding spikes are cut to suit. |
The rivets are black flexible rubber, overall 1+3/4 inches or 45mm long, the head 3/4 inch or 20mm across, length from head to midpoint one-way collar is just over half an inch or 15mm. They appear to be excluvely an NP Aerospace spare part, used only for their helmets, as no trace of them as a commercial product available to the public has been found. |
Head of rivet shown as in the liner. |
Stalk protruding from liner, this would have been set into the shell, with another several millimetres protruding as the well-known 'horns'. |
Comparison of new rivet (left) with rivet removed from helmet after having 'horn' cut off to allow removal. |
The rarely-seen date/size/makers moulding in the crown of a Mk6. |
Empty shell. |
LES TIPPETT was extraordinarily kind in passing on to me a Mk6 that had been sliced through from back to front. |
Cut shell without liner. |
The shell and liner must have been cut separately as the edges do not match perfectly. |
A posting about the Mk6 found on the forum at the ARRSE website - "Having been shown around the factory where they are made, I was told that they have an indefinite service life. As mentioned above, as long as the composite is not cracked (and believe me, this is pretty hard to do) they will pretty much last for ever. The liners do wear out of course and if you exchange yours with the RQMS, it will eventually find its way back to the factory for refurbishment and then re-issue. When I visited, there was a great big bin of them waiting to be worked on. My guide, who was a bit of a self-proclaimed Mk6 spotter, could recognise the date of manufacture from the codes on the inside. He proudly showed me one from the first year of manufacture, which he said would be good as new once it had been refurbished." |
|
Bisected Mk6. |
Photographs supplied by with special thanks to Les Tippett and Raj Khoria. |
Mk 6 - some more points of information |
|
The actual date of introduction of the Mk6 is a subject of some discussion; at this point there is no absolutely known date for its first issue or first use on active service. It is known, for example, that the Light Weight Parachutists helmet was used on active service in the Falklands/Malvinas war, and it is also know that a number of other ballistic plastic/composite type helmets were trialled around that the time, but no firm date for introduction of the Mk6 has been established. To demonstate the problem, here are some proposed
dates from usually reliable sources; From that it would seem 1982 is highly likely, but someone may know better. And indeed someone might; RICHARD AIXILL, in email correspondence, points to this Written Answer in HANSARD - COMBAT HELMETS HC Deb 21 January 1986 vol 90 Mr. Warren asked the Secretary of State for Defence what are his plans for the purchase of resin bonded fibre combat helmets; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Lee First issues of the new Mk 6 combat helmet, which is constructed in resin-bonded fibre, were made in 1985 and will continue over the next seven years until all relevant areas of the services are equipped with it. Which certainly provides a good fixed waypoint to hinge any argument around! The earliest dated Mk6 I have is shown here. Note that it is the early-type smooth light green finish. It is also comparatively light compared to a later production model - 1294g compared to 1458g (NB - the 1983-84 example is missing its chinstrap but that would not account for the whole disparity of weight). Notice also that this 1983-84 model does not have the two pre-prepared fixing holes for a visor as is usual in later production models, and that appears normal for all pre-NP-produced Mk6. Another surprising point from RICHARD AIXILL - "I recently purchased an unused 1987 mk6. This helmet is still in its original box (National Plastics) with the plastic bag and contemporary DPM cover. One special aspect is that the serial number on the box and the helmet match - I didn't realise that mk6 helmets had an individually serialised number." Certainly NP helmets always seem to have a serial, but it is surprising that that extended to the packaging as well. Worth noting that none of the NEI, the TRITON OLIVER or the RBR have serials. There is also some small mystery about when the surface texture transformed from smooth to rough. The latest dated smooth shell I have is 1986, and the earliest rough shell is label dated 1988/89. There is a bit of a problem with accurate dating because many helmets have lost their manufacturers labels and dating is then difficult without taking out the liner and seeing what is embossed on the inside of the shell - and that of course is a problem because there is no umlimited supply of CN8415 99 130 6035 Rivet Mk6 to put the liners back in again! An interesting piece of background, again from RICHARD AIXILL - "I am a serious collector of 1980’s period British military equipment. This interest stems from my own military service in the (Regular) British Army 1982-1988. I have some direct knowledge about the introduction of the MK6 helmet and I have also undertaken some research on the subject. From 1984 to 1986 I was based at Warminster IDB (Infantry Demonstration Battalion). Here we often worked with the ITDU (Infantry Trials and Development Unit). ITDU were an organisation fundamentally involved with the development and introduction of new equipment for the infantry and the army as a whole. Some of the equipment items I used at ITDU included trials and early versions of the MK VI helmet. These helmets were very similar to the final MK VI - having only minor design differences. Ballistic nylon composite helmets were undergoing user trials at this time and they were evident during the major BAOR exercise - Lionheart 84 - by elements of the 1st Battalion Irish Guards (note 1). The new composite material helmet was intended to replace the MK IV steel helmet. Research for this new helmet is suggested to have stemmed from developments to equipment used by the army in Northern Ireland (note.2). However, it is also possible that a trial (un-adopted) version of the composite helmet was titled MK V. Development upon new types of a ballistic Helmet, of varying designs, are suggested to have been conducted during in the late 1970’s - for a recognisable MK VI design was later listed for user trials to begin during 1981 (note.2). An extended later trial, of 1000 units, probably accounts for the MK VI examples dated 1983/4 manufactured by NEI Electronics LTD (note.5) . The MK VI design having been accepted for service, issue commenced with a pre-production run of 6,000 (this included issue to elements of 5 Airborne Brigade) (note. 5). This was then followed by the wider general issue, most likely commencing in mid to late 1985 (note. 5). I myself was issued my first MK VI in March 1986 whilst on attachment in Northern Ireland (issue to troops stationed in the province began sometime immediately prior). New equipment at this time was usually first issued to BAOR and NI troops then UK based Infantry followed by other units. Full scale issue continued over the next couple of years. The main production run of MK VI helmets was completed by NP (National Plastics). National Plastics were at this time part of the Courtaulds Group. The company subsequently changed its name to NP Aerospace and latterly Morgan Advanced Materials. The manufacturing facility has remained throughout at Foleshill Road Coventry (note 6). Note 1. Ref. Soldier Magazine 5/11/84 |
|
Shown below is the instruction leaflet as issued with the Mk6. It is interesting to note that it explicitly says the new helmet "replaces the steel Mk4" with no reference to the Mk5. Which may seem reasonable as the actual shells of the Mk4 and Mk5 are identical and interchangeable and fitted with the Lift-the-dot liner pin, the only difference being the liner itself. |
|
Two examples of a very early version of the Mk6 - possibly that known as the PM-6.These are - amazingly
- Thetford-made helmets that were very probably part of the early
1980s trials (of up to 17 variants?) that concluded with the introduction
of the production Mk6, typified by the most well-known NP Aerospace
production runs. It is perhaps not so surprising that Thetford was
involved as they were already engaged with production of the early
versions of the "HELMET, PARACHUTISTS,
Light Weight" (see above).
|
|
Side/top view |
Rear - two liner retaining pins in similar layout as on a common Mk6. |
Front - see single liner-retaining stud, not on any later production Mk6! |
The four holes may (not so certain) be for an visor fitting.
See note at end of this block. |
Note that there are two fabric straps running laterally front-back, part of the liner structure not continued in production models. |
|
Rear liner pins - similar in layout and form to the common Mk6 - but definitely not the same 'rubber mushroom' rivet. |
Front liner pin - this is actually a different kind of object to the rear studs - see below for a disassembled example of this helmet. |
Rear pins exterior |
Front pin exterior. |
Photographs supplied by |
|
Another example - disassembled, showing liner and details of liner retention pins. |
|
The front liner pin shows clearly here. |
No holes at lateral comms bulge - was this the normal factory-finish state? |
The chinstrap - with plastic chincup - is a simple one-piece fabric strap surprisngly similar to those used on the Mk 4/5 |
Thetford liner label is for a "Helmet, Combat, G.S. Mk6" |
Liner pins - the two white are the rear, the dark the front. |
Shell without liner. |
Chinstrap - simple fabric strap with plastic chincup. On this example (is it typical?) the strap seems to be unnecessarily long. |
As well as the Thetford label on the liner this Texolex sticker was found in the interior of the shell. |
This website (a very interesting one covering
the Falklands/Malvinas War) has an interesting reference to what
may be another of these pre-production helmets - claimed to have
been trialled during the 1982 conflict http://militariamalvinas.forumcommunity.net/?t=55103480 Please note that both examples shown here are numbered; Richard Jones' example is numbered 956 and James C's is numbered 600. |
Photographs supplied by |
MK6 - early edition by NEI ELECTRONICS - dated 1983-84 |
|
Photographs supplied by |
Photographs supplied by |
Mk6 - early edition by TRITON OLIVER - very rarely seen maker - dated 1984 |
|
TRITON OLIVER LTD seem to have been active in the West Midlands (England) up until the middle 1990s when they closed down or were absorbed into something other. They were in the plastics moulding business apart from anything else, and were obviously one of the other few companies like NEI who produced early runs of the GS Mk6. Anyway, this is pretty much a Mk6 EXCEPT for the the fact that like other very early runs from NEI and perhaps indeed the main contractor NP, it does not have the extra breakthrough holes on the side-wings for the face-shield brackets. A weight comparison with this and a much later NP Mk 6 shows the Triton Oliver is actually 40g lighter. While weighing this Triton Oliver and having it placed it upside down it was noticed that it did not roll around or settle at an angle as do many other examples that were then tested. This implies perhaps that the top of the shell is somewhat flatter than later production helmets. Whether this is an accident or an actual variation resulting from Triton Oliver production practices is another question. |
Photographs supplied by |
Mk6 - early edition, probably by TRITON OLIVER, although all labels have been removed. This example has had its liner removed. |
|
"This is the embossed moulding in the crown of the shell. "132-5611' is part of the NSN for this haelmet component. The 'H' is of unknown significance, perhaps a batch or mould identifer. "T.O.S.P." is also unproven, but a reasonable guess is that it identifies a TRITON-OLIVER product, in the same way that the letters 'NP' appear in the same place in shells made by National Plastics. Just by the moulding, shown in the photograph above right, is a small white sticker which has 'No. 188' handwritten on it. The other T-O helmet shown above has the number '144' handwritten on its label next to the manufacturer's name. This may indicate an actual production serial number, which may in turn indicate that T-O produced only a very small number of Mk6 helmets." |
Photographs supplied by |
Mk6 produced by RBR - an uncommon label for this helmet. Dated 1994 Indistinguishable from any other Mk6 except for the label! |
|
|
Photographs supplied by |
Mk6 with nape shield The padded shield is held by a strip of velcro glued into
the inside rear of the helmet. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
Mk6 - tested in Canada |
|
Photographs supplied by |
Mk6A -un upgraded version of the Mk6, with increased protective qualities. Introduced in the first decade of the 21stC during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The shell is virtually identical to the Mk6. All Mk6A helmets are black. The helmet is distinctly heavier than the Mk6. The liner is also different, reported by real users to be much more comfortable than the Mk6. The Mk6A iss issued with a black finish only - any other colour apparent in photos is an artefact. UK
Mk6 large = 1452g |
|
Photographs supplied by |
Mk6A - field conversion with para liner |
|
Acquired via eBay, this is a user conversion - showing much sign of use - of a Mk6a shell fitted with a paratroop liner and chinstrap. Best of both worlds? Several of these have been seen, so it must have been a successful conversion in the field. |
Photographs supplied by |
COURTAULDS AEROSPACE NP6 This helmet was obtained from Sweden. At first look this appears to be a more or less normal Mk6. But it is definately not. It is white. It has a black rim applied. It is heavy. |
|
The applied rim, either rubber or plastic,
difficult to tell. Not seen before on any version of the
Mk6. One might wonder why it is black on an otherwise white helmet, but
then of course one wonders why it is there at all. |
|
All interior fixtures and fittings are exactly was would be expected in a standard Mk6. |
The white is not obviously an amateur/end-user applied coat of white paint. It is crisp and even and virtually certainly a spray-painted factory application. To check whether it was a white paint or whether (perhaps even more amazingly) it had been moulded from white material, a small amount of scraping was done, and the paint was difficult to remove. You can see the typical Mk6 green under the white, proving that the original moulding was green as for a standard Mk6. |
Photographs supplied by |
|
And it is heavy! Really heavy. It is a medium size (as shown on both the label and the liner insert), and compared to a medium Mk6 it appears the same size, and yet it weighs a substantial 1786g. That's a massive increase over a standard late production medium Mk6 which is 1392g, and a more or less 200g more than a medium Mk6A which is 1592g. That's a lot, and while the edge-strip which is not present on either the 6 or 6A must add some weight it can't possibly explain the increase. The label is interesting too; as you can see the manufacturer is shown as COURTAULDS AEROSPACE, not the most common 6 or 6A maker National Plastics (NP Aerospace). This is interesting in the context of Sweden (where it came from, remember) because the Swedish Hjalm 90 was originally produced by Courtaulds and badged with their name as manufacturer. There may be a link here. Whatever it may be it seems unlikely that it was a competitor to the Hjalm 90, as this label is dated 1995, which I believe is well after the initial production and issue of the Hjalm 90. The model number given on the label is NP6, about which I can find no information. It also has a NATO stock number which seems to read 13387-017 and which shows up as a sort of push-button assembly, so obviously some mistake. I did try 13367-017 but no result at all there. There's also a serial number for this particular helmet, which is 8. Now that could mean nothing at all, but I do wonder whether there was a very short production run. As it came from Sweden there is a suggestion that it might be a trials helmet for another nation in the region; it was suggested that Finland had at some point trialled the Mk6 but again the date of this white object is after the introduction of the locally-made Komposiittikypara K92, fielded in the early 1990s. The only information the Swedish seller could offer was that he believed it had been used in Somalia in the 1990s. |
|
Unusual as the NP6 model is, there is at least one other NP6, which is in most ways similar. It is not white, but it has an applied rim over the usual moulded Mk6 edging. The interior fixtures and fittings (not shown here) are as one would expect in a standard Mk6. It was listed as being a 'special purpose' or trials helmet. Apart from the visor - and being green rather than white - it is clearly very similar to the white one. No idea of the weight. Pictures taken from Ebay. I had contacted the seller about the label and he was kind enough to supply information:- There are two labels, one says: Nato number: (unfilled) Serial: 280950 Batch No: 6/941 NATIONAL PLASTICS COVENTRY, UK -- The second one Product: NP6/I/L V 50 Std. 17 grain trag : 520 |
Another NP6, or more specifically NP6/1. |
|
Owner Oliver Lock says "a trials version of the British MK6 tested by the Danish Army. It feels a bit more heavy than the normal UK version, and has a strong rubber rim binding...It came via a friend who has been a career soldier in the Danish army ." Considering the white NP6 above was sourced from Sweden (but origin unknown) and we know Courtaulds supplied the Hjalm90 to sweden, it seems there may heve been an effort to sell this Mk6 version generally in Scandinavia. Someone must know more - please tell us. |
|
|
Photographs supplied by |
NP PECOC model - compare and contrast with the Mk7 below. |
|
|
Photographs supplied by |
"This British helmet was part of the “PECOC” (Personal Equipment Common Operating Clothing) project and presumably lost out to the Mk7 to be the next (current) combat helmet although a "Soldier Systems" article seems to suggest that the Mk7 is an interim solution. PECOC was originally scheduled for Operational Deployment in 2011 (this helmet is dated 2009), having been at Assessment stage in late 2010 – the intention was to replace the ’95 style kit in use building on the learnings from operational theatre (presumably GW1). It looks like PECOC encompassed clothing (style and camo), load carrying equipment, helmets and light weaponry. From the outside this helmet looks like a Mk7 / MICH hybrid, being the same colour and thickness of the Mk7 but having a much steeper rear and less flared side sections. Whilst the strap is the same as the Mk7, the liner system is very different, consisting of a shaped inner skull-cap with 2 moveable Velcro-backed pads (there may have been more)." This example was made by National Plastics, is size “small” and weighs 1.3kg |
NP PECOC |
|
"Trial NVG bracket attached to the front. The liner differs from that in the PECOC illustrated above and is more like a Mk6 one in appearance except for the ridges running across it." |
Photographs supplied by |
NP PECOC This is another, possibly later, PECOC variant byNational Plastics (or NP Aerospace). It’s clearly the same shape as the others shown here but the overall finish suggests a more complete example and perhaps one which was built with sales in mind rather than for evaluation. There were at least 4 versions of the PECOC helmet so perhaps we have three here now. This model came from Germany having been acquired “from a soldier some years ago”. It’s probably easier to start by listing the areas of similarity before looking at the differences. This, like the sand coloured example, is a Small size and weighs 1.3kg. The shell is identically shaped and textured and the inner shaped cloth-covered skull /inner-crown liner is also the same in this model but that’s where the similarities end. The shell is black inside and out. The shell has no holes for any liner plugs (as Velcro is used inside) and the front set of holes for the strap are lower and further back than all three other examples displayed here. The rear liner bolt is considerably higher which could make non-British NVG rear brackets easier to fit. The rim edging strip is one-piece i.e. there is no join. In addition its shape is more defined and carries an “NP AEROSPACE” logo to the outer rear. There are no other labels. |
|
The Suspension system /strap Whilst still a 5-point harness the material, colour and positioning differs. Two different black material types are used. There’s an additional padded nape piece which is stitched to the rear strap and drops down around the wearers lower neck. Whilst it’s permanently attached to the straps it can be removed from the inner skull-liner as it’s Velcro-backed – this allows it to be adjusted up, down and sideways. A sliding buckle is also on the rear central strap. The side tensioners/adjusters are identical to those on the Mk6 and Mk7 and not the double-D rings on the other PECOCs here. The split chin-cup has no black suede filler section –this chin-cup is two separate straps. The strap is attached by 5 nuts/slotted-bolts as per the Mk6 and Mk7 helmets – these can be easily removed. The chip cup arrangement creates 6 layers of strap on the left side when closed – the other PECOCs have 3. |
|
The Liner The inner skull piece is held in place by long Velcro-strips and can be removed to reveal an “NP” logo in the inner crown of the shell itself– the skull piece in the PECOC with the Revision bracket on is fixed in place by the long rubber plugs which are also found on the Mk6 and Mk7. This version does not have the Mk6 and M7-style adjuster straps around the rear of the skull piece. The skull piece has a number of metal strips glued around the edge – these MAY be in the other models too but without dismantling them it’s not possible to confirm either way. On this model, these strips have been filed at the edges – file marks are visible (presumably to removesharp edges?). The “corrugated” removable padded front brow pad is the same as that on the Steve Sheppard example (below) but there is no label. There are 2 smaller inner pads but these are small, thin and soft and one must question how effective these are and what value they actually add. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
NP PECOC variant liner |
|
|
Photographs supplied by |
PECOC - yet another variant ! This particular example has a smooth shiny grey finish inside and out and the overall appearance suggests this was a test or evaluation piece. Other differences include:- - The black edging strip is wider on the inside of the shell and appears to have been "let-in" to the shell itself as it is not proud on the inner edge. - There’s no adjuster strap running behind the black moulded skull cap piece (although this isn’t consistent across the PECOC range). - There are no rubber “darts”attaching the skull cap to the shell – it is assumed that this particular model either has Velcro attachment strips or adhesive; the skull cap is fragile in this example and removal would cause further damage. |
|
The front and rear linerpads appear to be
moulded rather than leather-covered. They are also a different shape
to those used in other models and have been glued to the hardskull
cap inner. |
|
The harness-attaching Allen-headbolts are positioned as per the sand coloured examples but they have corroded over time. |
|
This example lacks labels (except for two
paper labels referring to “15” [thickness?]). |
Photographs supplied by |
Mk7 - see also NP AEROSPACE AC900 immediately below The Mk7 was introduced in 2009; it was originally believed to be an off-the-shelf version of the pre-existing NP Aerospace AC600/900, not a new design. |
|
The Left-hand element of the chinstrap has been
broken and field-repaired with medical tape. |
Right-hand chinstrap element, showing buckle which should be present also on the Left. |
Note that the chinstrap has two pop-stud connectors, one at each end, different to the single pop-stud on the Mk6 and 6A |
The net in the crown can be adjusted slightly by shifting this velcro band which lies underneath it. Adjustment is not easy. |
This pad at the rear of the chinstrap rigging appears to function as some sort of steadying-point, fitting at the nape. |
The pad has to be pulled down very firmly when putting on the helmet or it becomes jammed into the rear interior pad and may be uncomfortable. |
This example of the Mk7 is a Large size, and weighs 1466g.
|
|
|
Photographs supplied by |
NP AEROSPACE AC900 "This is the British AC900 made by NP Aerospace. According to the label, it was made in 2005 and has a low serial number (obscured) which suggests that it was one of the first few made. This helmet is clearly the forerunner to the MkVII introduced in 2009. I can only assume that, during trials, the 3 point harness arrangement (similar to the MkVI) proved inadequate and the design was changed as a result. These photographs have been taken from the same angles as those taken of the MkVII on this site to enable a direct comparison to be made. It would be hard to say that the differences between the two helmets are numerous but they ARE noticeable. The key differences are:- - colour - the AC900 is black - the MkVII is sand-yellow (one can only assume this will change as/when Operations change) - the 900 has a 3 point harness whilst the the MkVII has a 5 point harness arrangement - the straps on the 900 are black and man-made material - those on the MkVII are green and appear to be more akin to traditional webbing - the fastenings on the harness are different - the 900 has a paper makers label behind the rear head pad It has been suggested that these AC900 and the Mk7 are the same helmet - clearly the shell and the inner appear to be the same but the harness (+ associated catches, buckles etc) and the shell colour makes the 900 a different helmet. This particular example has minor surface scratching to the outer shell but appears to be unissued - internally it is in mint condition" |
|
Photographs supplied by |
|
Something rarely seen, the size/date/serial moulding in the
crown of an AC900 shell, hidden by the liner. |
NP AC902 from another example of the 902, which has a loose liner (intentionally by actual user, or because the glue failed, the world may never know) - at the very least it resolves the question above as to how the liner is held in place. |
|
Embossed in the crown of the helmet are
a number of characters within a ring outline - not easy to read
but identifiable markings are - |
|
|
Photographs supplied by |
CTT |
|
"This is a British "Helmet, SF, CTT". It is effectively a Mk7 or an AC900/600 but unlike the 900, it has formal designation and contract number which suggests these were/are produced and issued in some quantity. The only differences I can find are:- - front liner head pad - this is cloth covered on this model whilst on the & and the 900 it has a soft leather covering - the washers to the inner side bolts are black on this model (and the Mk7), whilst they're clear on the 900 - labels and designation - this model has a seperate liner label and a distict designation ("SF, CTT"). Unlike other AC variants there is no reference to "NP Aerospace" (or Courtaulds) and this is as per the Mk7 - whilst identically shaped helmets are detailed on the NP Aerospace website there is no reference to the SF CTT. As per other 900s, this one was originally black before having its outer custom camo applied." |
Photographs supplied by |
CTT Another example of the NP CTT helmet, showing its more usual
black finish, and a little more detail of the chinstrap rig. |
|
|
Photographs supplied by |
NATIONAL PLASTICS AC100 |
|
"This AC/100 was bought a few years ago in a large surplus store which is located next to a large naval base in my home town, the owner of the Business could not shed any light on it's provenance other than it might be a "Police helmet or SAS"? Other than this information and the pictures provided I have no evidence it was used by a Special Forces operative, however the National Plastics website at the time of purchase stated these models were used by British Special Forces, as well as sold to foreign countries for similar usage. The helmet weighs in at 3489 grammes as it is shown. The cheek guards are removable as they are attached with Allen key bolts.The visor is also removable with the standard twist style fixing." |
Photographs supplied by |
NATIONAL PLASTICS AC100/UL Dated 1992, and obviously similar but not
identical to other AC100 family products. The red 'warning' sticker possibly implies
it was for civil rather than military use. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
NP AEROSPACE AC100/600 |
|
Photographs supplied by |
|
"The AC100/600 was designed in 1986 to meet the demanding requirements of Special Forces operations and is still successfully in operation with many forces today. It has a MkVI-esque liner and a raised "peak", presumably for Respirators and weapons sights. This product is specially designed to interface with respirators, communications / active noise reduction, goggles, night vision and visor assemblies. This mint un-issued example is Medium sized and weighs approximately 2.25kg." |
NP AEROSPACE AC100/600 - another variant. |
|
Unlike the AC100/UL shown above this has a chinstrap arrangement very similar to that used on the Mk6 helmet. |
|
The polystyrene liner cap is held in by strips of tape, one side velcro the other strong but liftable adhesive. |
There is a crown embossing but in common with many NP helmets produced essentially for the civil market it is not easily legible. Military helmets such as the Mk6 or Mk7 have clearly legible well-struck embossings. |
Photographs supplied by |
AC100 variant - specific designation unknown |
|
Several detail differences between this and the known AC100/600 shown above - no blind rivet (for faceshield?) on side, minor differences to liner, colour....is this an early model, or something else entirely? |
Photographs supplied by |
COURTAULDS AEROSPACE AC200 Note the Courtaulds label (dated 1997), not the commonly used NP Aerospace - which was a part of the Courtaulds combine. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
NP AEROSPACE AC200/620 This variant of the AC200 immediately above has the more usual
NP Aerospace label and is dated 2001 |
|
Photographs supplied by |
NP AEROSPACE AC200/620 - probably! |
|
The crown pad is held to the polystyrene liner with a simple velcro tape threaded through the liner. |
Partially dismounted liner. |
The strips of tape - adhesive one side, velcro other side - that hold in the liner. |
Illegible embossing - typical of NP helmets for civil use. |
The wilful overwriting of the labels seems to have become normal for many helmets put into the surplus market by the police or other paramilitary organisations. Unfortunately. |
Photographs supplied by |
NP AEROSPACE AC200/650 |
|
Photographs supplied by |
NP AEROSPACE AC200/650 |
|
see here for info on OSCE |
Photographs supplied by |
NP AEROSPACE AC200/650 |
|
"Another example of the AC200/650, claimed to have been used by UK Police. Size Large, weighs 1566g. Entire liner is held in with velcro strips, the bolts hold only the chinstrap rig. NB what looks like a German-type breakaway catch on the chinstrap is not, it is permenently fixed." |
Photographs supplied by |
NP AC600/575 This may not be a true - complete - 600/575 - please read notes below. |
|
There is something unusual about this helmet. The liner is loose and there is a mismatch between the Velcro fixing strips on the liner itself and those on the shell (different places, different number of corresponding velcro strips). The liner does not feel right - fits badly - when fitted into the shell. It is hard to believe it is the original liner. As the makers label is affixed to the liner and not the shell it may be that this is not a 600/575 shell at all. But see the three pictures immediately below - taken from an auction site in 2013 - which seem to show the same shell with a different liner but with a 600/575 label affixed to the shell itself. There is a HIGH degree of uncertainty here - are there at least two versions of the 600/575? |
|
Below, the shell without liner and the liner itself. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
NATIONAL PLASTICS EOD (Explosive Ordnance Disposal) This helmet has a shell very similar to the (possible) AC600/575 shown above, but the liner and chinstrap are distinctly different. See particularly the rubber rivet horns at the rear, familiar from the Mk6 and Mk6A helmets. |
|
The mountings for a faceplate are bolted to
the shell - two bolts each side. Very difficult to remove!
|
|
The net crownpiece is adjustable by very
long velcro tabs. |
|
This label is from another identical helmet, not the one otherwise shown. |
|
Weight - 1396g. Assumed to be a medium size.
|
Photographs supplied by |
COURTAULDS AEROSPACE AC700/450, dated 1997.
Courtaulds
was effectively the predecessor company of what we know as NATIONAL
PLASTICS AEROSPACE (NP Aerospace - home of the Mk6, 6A, 7, and most of
the Para Lightweights, and lots of other helmets - now Morgan Composites
...pay attention). I don't know this as a provable fact but
observation tells me that the Courtaulds
name was continued in use during the 1990s for a variety of
export-oriented items, most notable what is better known as the Swedish
Hjalm90. So it is possible that this was an export product. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
NP AEROSPACE NP9 |
|
Photographs supplied by |
|
"Purchased at a show in my home town York, PA, USA. It is obviously a British made helmet by National Plastics, the seller told me it was made for the Dutch military. I have no way of know if this is true." |
NATIONAL PLASTICS NP9/OC Dated 1991, this is very similar to the blue helmet shown above, acquired from the Netherlands so the supposition that it was intended for Dutch use seems correct, but there is no known evidence it was ever actually taken into service. See also the helmet immediately below. |
|
|
Photographs supplied by |
NATIONAL PLASTICS NP9/OC Lbel clearly reads NP9/OC. but this helmet is not the same as those show immediately above. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
NATIONAL PLASTICS. COMBAT VEHICLE CREWMAN'S HELMET(CVC)- undated, early 1980s, 1982-83?. Usually worn with a Racal headphone/microphone set, not shown. |
|
The camouflage paint-job is unusual for this type, and is not, despite superficial similarities, that of the Irish Army, according to camo expert Adrian Blake. |
|
The camouflage may actually be a recognition factor is user Taylor was actually an Instructor in a training camp. This is the rear of the helmet. |
Front. |
The chinstrap is often missing from these helmets, removed as inconvenient. As one user said when asked about this - "We were usually sitting in the vehicle, not running around in the open or expecting to be climbing trees." |
|
|
Photographs supplied by |
AEGIS - commercial helmet. |
|
|
Photographs supplied by |
AEGIS HELMET |
|
Photographs supplied by |
AEGIS ENGINEERING RAP 100 |
|
"A black nylon cover velcroed around a soft, ballistic cap that is placed on what looks like a vacuum formed liner. There is no discernable way of affixing the outer onto the inner. I have only seen three if these." |
Photographs supplied by |
AEGIS ENGINEERING. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
AEGIS ENGINEERING AP 19022 |
|
An unusual object, the AEGIS AP 19022, looking like the mutant offspring of a mating between a NP AC100 and a Mk6. The black colour and the red 'Warning' label imply police/security use rather than military issue. The partially obscured label shown at bottom right contains technical information. The chinstrap is a fairly common type including a push-pull plastic catch, but looks confused in these photographs as a previous owner chose to remove the retaining bolts from both left and right sides. The applied rim is a fairly hefty rubber or thick plastic. The helmet label is dated 1994, it is sized as an unusual 'medium - large', and the weight (except for two missing nuts&bolts) is a substantial 1698g, rather heavier than either a Mk6 large = 1452g or a Mk6A large = 1628g |
photographs supplied by |
BRISTOL ARMOUR helmets Helmets from the early 1980s made by Bristol Composite Materials Engineering Ltd. Two of them were acquired by Canadian DND in 1984, presumably just for examination as they do not seem to have been used in the trials that the Orlites, PASGTs and Mk.6s were subjected to. The third one came from a surplus dealer in Belfast |
|
B.A. Grade 9 helmet. |
B.A. Grade 9 helmet. |
B.A. unknown trials helmet. |
B.A. unknown trials helmet. |
B.A. Grade 17 helmet. |
B.A. Grade 17 helmet. |
B.A. Grade 17 helmet. |
B.A. Grade 17 helmet. |
|
photographs supplied by |
BRISTOL ARMOUR - Grade 9 A surprisingly light helmet - just 892g and it is possibly a Medium (label says '4') size. Note label in English and German. |
|
photographs supplied by |
BRISTOL ARMOUR - Grade 17 COMPARE WITH THE PRECEDING BRISTOL ARMOUR PRODUCTS This is a rather unusual production from Bristol Armour, who seem to have been a subsidiary of British Petroleum, operating out of Bristol, England. They were active during the 1980s and presumably previously. but vanished in the early 1990s. |
|
This specific helmet has a similar shape and form to other Bristol products (see immediately above) but it seems poorly made overall. The shell is thick and roughly made. The outside surface is rough overall, and it has a feel similar to a piece of (believe it or not) earthenware rather than a sophisticated ballistic plastic. It feels like a roof tile, in fact, and even has the same sort of dull ringing sound when tapped. Its actually hard to believe it really is plastic and not pottery. |
|
The chinstrap obviously has its central part missing - compare to the blue example which has a complete chinstrap rig. The helmet also appears to have had a applied rim, probably similar to that on the blue one shown above, at some time. Long gone, along with the central chinstrap section. |
|
See the strange rippling effect on the interior of the shell. |
|
The liner is is a very simple bowl made of expanded polystyrene, with a very thin synthetic fabric liner. There is no sign it was glued in, and no sign of any fixative of any kind implies it was intended to hold by pressure and friction alone. The blue Bristol Grade 9 shown above has a similar liner, but it seems to be made of a more flexible and durable polythene-like material, and seems to be securely fixed, perhaps with glue! |
|
The label is hard to read in the photo because it is inside a sealed plastic envelope sewn to the liner. Apart from the makers name and address it includes GRADE - 17 and SIZE - 3. There is also a long ITEM PART number which when web-researched produced no result. This helmet weighs a fairly hefty 1420g, and that's without a missing chinstrap section and its rim edge. That's actually more than a medium British GS Mk6 (1340g), and a lot more than the blue Bristol shown above, which is a distinct lightweight at 896g in complete state. No date, though one might assume 1980s. |
photographs supplied by |
BRISTOL - unknown type ? This was filed in the USA section as an Unknown, but it has many characteristics in common with other Bristol armour products so UK seems more appropriate. Possibly Police/Special Forces ? |
|
"I don't know what this helmet is exactly, but I believe it's US-made, probably out of fiber glass. It is VERY heavy." |
Photographs supplied by |
GLOBAL ARMOUR PASCUT ASSAULT HELMET |
|
"British Special Forces-used PASCUT ASSAULT
HELMET ARMOUR LEVEL 3A. |
|
|
Photographs supplied by |
Special Forces Helmet - KEJO? |
|
"This cut-away helmet was used by a British SF operative in Afghanistan. It closely resembles the Sarker ALPHA side-cut helmet (strap differs), the Vestguard SF helmet and the Kejo SF helmet (liner differs). It's assumed to be the Kejo version as there is evidence of a label to the inner rear as per Kejo. The sand-coloured paint has worn off the black rubber edging but there's no evidence of the shell being any other colour previously. The liner pads are unusually thin and are attached to strips of Velcro rather than the usual discs / "coins" - however they have been in the helmet for some time and have experienced some wear. The shaped pads on the sides are very unusual but they fit the shape of the helmet. The 4-point harness has a soft rubber chin cup and adjustable nape strap. Even with these thin pads, this helmet still sits high on the head leaving the side of the head almost totally exposed." Weight 1.05kg |
Photographs supplied by |
LBA INTERNATIONAL COMBAT HELMET Lightweight Body Armour International product, though not obvious which one |
|
"This is a British LBA helmet of an 'advisory' role. Apparently it came out of Iraq where the previous owner had put in MICH pads - hence their presence. It is weird that it has a 'belt-and-braces' crown pad and netting. Even in their website, there is no mention of this particluar model - especially of the half-netting that this version has." |
Photographs supplied by |
LBA (Lightweight Body Armour) F6 Combat Helmet. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
|
"This helmet has been used in a ballistics test and is from the LBA stable. The shell is PASGT-esque but without the hard lines at the sides. The liner on this version is sparse but functional. This one has been the subject of 3 tests (9mm x 2 and .357 x 1) - none have penetrated the shell. There is no confirmation that these tests were undertaken by LBA themselves. More information can be found at the LBA website. It may be that 'F6' isn't a model number...perhaps more of a protection level I guess as this doesn't look anything like my other F6 ! (see immediately below) Weight (Large size) - 1.45kg" |
LBA badged as BULLDOG ARMOUR Armour F6 Mach 1 |
|
Photographs supplied by |
|
"A Bulldog Armour F6 Mach 1 Helmet. The suppliers website claims that...... "the Bulldog helmet is aimed at the Special Forces, Military and Police Special Tactical Units". British Special Forces currently use this cut of helmet with the NIJ IIIA ballistic protection in Olive Drab. This particular 2008-dated example has been sprayed-painted "sand" on the outside - it was intended for CPD work in Iraq. Upon closer inspection a "4" is visible behind the liner netting to the inner crown and an unusual rectangular deformity to the paint inside the helmet turned out to be an over-painted label from "LBA" ("Lightweight Body Armour") - see LBA helmet from Arthur Benjamins above. This is actually an LBA helmet which appears to have been re-supplied by "Bulldog"." |
BULLDOG? LBA? KEJO? HELMET Has similarities to other known helmets but no proof as to its origins. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
|
"This is a British-used ballistic helmet, produced (or at least marketed) by the British company "Bulldog" although there are no markings on this example to substantiate this. It is designed to offer level 3a protection. It is claimed that this helmet was used extensively on combat operations in Afghanistan, by a member of the Elite Pathfinder Platoon and then by a member of 3 Commando Brigade Recce Force. It is fitted with a 7 point padding system and 4-point harness with molded plastic chin-cup. The pads themselves are thin and very similar to those in the "Kejo" cut-out helmet also on this site (the second Kejo helmet shown on the USA page) - these may simply come from the same source themselves or the helmets do (a similar blank label can be found to the inner rear of both). Size - Large Weight - 1.25kg |
RBR COMBAT S4 "RBR Combat S4, which, as you can see from the comparative pictures (below), is identical to the italian Sistemi Compositi except it has no feathers. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
|
Italian Sistema Compositi |
Italian Sistema Compositi |
RBR BALLISTIC COMBAT HELMET F2 |
|
Photographs supplied by |
RBR COMBAT HELMET F5 |
|
Photographs supplied by |
RBR S4 - export model? |
|
"...for the Brit section?..US section?...who owns RBR nowadays?...another RBR variant....it came from Poland and from the name on the back it looks like it was used "out East" for something...or by Eastern folk somewhere else? Anyway, this is another RBR Ballistic Helmet. It's very similar to the green F5 model above but there are subtle differences:- - the peak is less pronounced There is no evidence of green paint - it would seem that this was either white, or its current UN Blue. Weight - 1.3kg" |
Photographs supplied by |
RBR EXPORT SAMPLE - many similarities to the RBR helmets shown
above. There is no RBR label but the provenance is unarguable. The shell and the liner and chinstrap rigs are identical to those of known RBR products as shown above.The label is obviously that of a trading company, possibly even RBR itself given the similarity of typeface and overall design. |
|
This helmet was featured in the 'UNKNOWN' section for some time until the similarity between it and the other RBR products was noted. Distressing lack of observational skills all round, really. |
Photographs supplied by |
RBR F6 |
|
Photographs supplied by |
|
"The label is partially blacked out, but I think this is an RBR helmet, similar to the F5 model from Adrian Blake. The heavy ballistic face shield came with the helmet." Confirmed to be an RBR F6 by Aleksandr Solovjov. |
RBR COMBAT HELMET F6 "A 1998 dated example of the RBR F6 helmet. A thick heavy (1.58kg) shell, which appears to have been over-painted black if the scuffs on the rim piece are anything to go by although this may be restricted to the edge itself. Very similar inside to the blue ("export") example and the shell is the same as the LBA F6 white test rig in this section...which is hardly surprising as LBA acquired RBR in March 2001. The shell itself has a fixed thick inner shell lining but the same basic suspension straps as found in many of the composites of it's time. This version has a green webbing 3-point harness." |
|
Photographs supplied by |
RBR DEFENDER F6 |
|
"LBA (they took over RBR) describe this helmet as "a unique style of ballistic helmet, which introduces improved comfort and fit when using ear defenders". They also claims that it was "originally developed for the Swedish army (Hjalm 90)". It is the classic MICH shaped shell, albeit more flared at the sides, with basic liner (front and rear padded sections with velcro adjusted side pieces) and 3-point black webbing harness with chin cup. This particular example clearly started life black and has been painted both outside and inside, leaving the label exposed via masking. The inner shell of this example has self-adhesive velcro strips attached suggesting that it may have once been fitted with pads but the original liner has been re-fitted. It is not standard British Army issue. Weight ("dressed") - 1.62kg" |
Photographs supplied by |
RBR S4 POLICE RIOT HELMET not really a military composite helmet, obviously, but from a Known Producer. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
'SPECIAL FORCES' helmet - possibly by RBR |
|
|
Photographs supplied by |
TETRANIKE APH9 see also as used by Norway The APH9 has an extraordinarily simple and possibly ineffective chinstrap secured only by a single strip of Velcro. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
TETRANIKE/LIGHTWEIGHT BODY ARMOUR From the label this is 'Helmet Type PP H6" It seems to be the same basic shell as the Tetranike illustrated above, but the liner, chinstrap and rivet placement are distinctly different. |
|
Is very nose-heavy. |
|
This is a metal thread set into the shell, probably for a visor fitting. |
|
The leather band is apparently fitted for the forehead only, there is no sign that a section is missing from the rear of the headband. |
|
The chinstrap is secured to the shell with simple pop-studs. Unusual. |
Very simple artificial fibre chinstrap with vinyl chincup. |
No size shown, looks to be a medium at best, but it is heavy - 1454g, compared to 1390g for a late-production medium Mk6. It also has the same brick-like ceramic feel as a Bristol helmet detailed above. |
Photographs supplied by |
An unusual green - factory-finish - TETRANIKE/LBA found by a collector in Poland around 1994-95. The label has iit as "9mm A/Ballistic" No real knowledge of who or where it was supplied to. Most of these helmets are blue, meaning civil (police, security) use. Green tends to be military. Note - this is not the same model as shown in the Norway section. |
|
|
Photographs supplied by |
TETRANIKE APH 10 |
|
Note that the lower fixture on the sides is not the chinstrap retainer, it is a blind push-out rivet which covers a brass thread set into the shell to take a face-shield, as on the Tetranike helmet shown immediately above. |
|
The LBA label on the right is taken from another otherwise identical helmet, and shows the type to be APH 10 |
Photographs supplied by |
THETFORD MOULDED PRODUCTS helmet - used in Northern Ireland. |
|
Note that chinstrap assembly appears identical to that of first model UK para helmet (see above). |
Photographs supplied by |
THETFORD RIOT HELMET - "HELMET, COMBAT, N.I. PATTERN" |
|
"This is another lightweight British helmet made by Thetford moulded products. Despite looking very similar to the Parachutist version this one, the “Helmet, Combat, NI Pattern” (Northern Ireland) is quite different. Key differences are:- different shell shape, flared over the ears visor attachment nuts/bolts (+ visor [detachable]) the liner does not have the clear plastic laced flaps and padded black headband - this one is more basic the green vinyl strap has a metal buckle in place of the green plastic one the shell material is more coarse, resembling Glass Reinforced Plastic in places This particular example is complete with DPM-pattern cloth visor cover and original carrying bag." |
Photographs supplied by |
THETFORD N.I. HELMET - the first two images are of a comparatively unusual black example - not painted but moulded in black material. |
|
Shown below is the more usual green shell. Useful detail pictures. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
PROTECH helmet - in UK military service? |
|
Photographs supplied by |
|
"This helmet is a heavy-shelled MICH-pattern (peak-less) with a 4 point harness and what is fast becoming standard non-pad liner, closely resembling, in design at least, the British Mk6A although materials are different. It's been painted an overall sand colour (the underlying original colour is not clear but it's assumed to be black. It is not standard issue in the British army so it's assumed it was a private purchase. This helmet came from Hereford and is said to have served in both Iraq and Afghanistan although it's condition can only suggest that it has been extremely well cleaned internally and cared for since - this sheds a little doubt on it's claimed "active service". The adhesive paper label inside states it's made by Protech Armored Products (Massachusetts, USA) - this label is also in remarkably good condition for a helmet said to have been used in service. The inner crown is marked "SDS L-23A". It is an American helmet but in British use." |
UNITED SHIELD PST SC650 This example was originally posted in the UNKNOWN page but was eventually discovered to be a United Shield product. Label shown here, taken from an Ebay listing. A black - usually meaning police or other non-military use - helmet but with some traces of a green finish showing through the scuffs and scratches. Well used. Very nose-heavy, as the photographs show. Many liner elements held in with velcro. Many similarities to NP or RBR products. No markings of any kind, although there was once a label removed by some determinedly unhelpful person. Note especially the unusual plastic breakaway catch, also the comparatively unusual liner bolts. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
M.L.A. SC650 Commando This is a commercial product sold to Special Forces and Police forces. Black composite shell with padded front and rear liner. 4 point harness with split strap chin-cup. 'M.L.A.' is actually Michael Lupton Associates which is a supplier rather than manufacturer; their helmets are very similar if not identical to those with a similar 'SC650' designation badged as UNITED SHIELD, SECOND CHANCE, or others. See immediately above, for example. Size - Medium Weight - 1.41kg |
|
Label on left from this MLA helmet, on right
an example showing 'Second Chance' as supplier. |
Photographs supplied by |
VESTGUARD ACH-PASGT This is Vestguard's "Advanced Combat Helmet - PASGT". Vestguard is a UK producer/distrubutor of helmets, body armour etc. This helmet is different to that shown immediately below in that the lateral bulges are more pronounced, the edging is thicker and more square and it has a 3 point harness (and therefore 5 liner "bolts" rather than 4). It is available in other colours (UN Blue, Sand, Green). Size - Large Weight - 1.52kg |
|
|
VESTGUARD UK PASGT clone |
|
Photographs supplied by |
Jack Ellis PST H10 "Jack Ellis supplies Helmets and Body Armour from their company in Scotland, UK. This helmet (labelled PST H10although listed as SC650/427 on their web site) came back from 'Afghan' and was believed to have been used by Contractors or SF. It's pretty much identical to the MLA 650 / Commando helmet. Indeed, an internet search reveals several distributors (presumably not manufacturers?) of 650's including United Shield (PSTSC650). This one has the usual lightweight basic liner found in most of the commercial PASGT-variants but also has an unusual label partially exposed in the crown. According to the JE website they're available in black and blue. Size - Large Weight - 1.5kg" The suspicion is that this helmet, like some others, is not designed and manufactured by the company selling it, but is essentially identical to several other commcial products available in the British Isles and USA, and produced at one facility and badged for retail by outside sellers. The RBR/United Shield company is probably the originator. |
|
Photographs supplied by |
Gecko Open Face Helmet / Mk10 Marine Safety Helmet Glamorised by Fast Boat and SBS troops this is effectively a light weight “bump helmet” for water-going troops. It is made by the Cornish company “Gecko” which was established in 1993; this particular model is dated 2002. The liner in this model is missing the central crown pad and some models have interiors which can be inflated to improve fit (and buoyancy?). |
|
Photographs supplied by |